monkeeys

monkeeys

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Rob Cohen, Larry Schwartz and failure to file

Recent story in President Trump's paper of record the New York Post about Larry Schwartz failure to file his financial disclosure reports for the last 2 years http://nypost.com/2017/02/12/mta-board-members-failed-to-declare-income/

I especially like the JJOKE comment when asked what they will do about it “we have processes to follow.”  Processes to follow that's funny.  Here is the JJOKE process we learned from Seth Agata when he got caught with his thumb up Joe Percocco's ass.

Step one: Don't review 2nd floor big shots financial disclosure reports
Step two: pray no one FOILS said reports
Step three: notify the 2nd floor when a FOIL comes in requesting said reports
Step four: pray the media doesn't report on the reports or JJOKE's coverup of said reports
Step five: say we will follow a process and do better next time.

NEXT TIME JUST ARRIVED Mr. Agata

How could you possibly have missed Schwartz's non filing after the Percocco disaster?

Is this your idea of doing better?

I was told by my sources on the second floor that after Percocco JJOKE had reviewed all the top staffs reports. (that could be a lie)

Maybe they did, in which case step three above is in effect.

Which brings me to Rob Cohen.

Why would Cuomo appoint "Mr. walk into closets" "Don't file my attorney registration" to be a commissioner at JJOKE?  Could it be that Rob Cohen was the JJOKE staffer responsible for the financial disclosure reports and knows where all the bodies are buried?  Maybe the timing of his appointment makes more sense now.  And we know he knows about not filing reports on time. http://davidgrandeau.blogspot.com/2013/09/out-of-closet-rob-cohen.html

I guess I should add a step six to the process.

Step six: let the JJOKE commissioners meet in executive session so Rob Cohen can explain why he is covering up for the 2nd floor.

Now lets just hope he puts another book down on the mic button so we all can listen in.

JJOKE is the absolute worst ethics agency in the history of New York ethics agencies and that is saying something.

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Rob Cohen nuff said

JJOKE's newest commissioner is Rob Cohen.

Formerly a JJOKE special counsel.

The same special counsel that was responsible for turning on the hot mic during an executive session of JCOPE almost 4 years ago to the day (Jan 30 2013).

I promised some of my second floor friends I wouldn't say anything about the pick so I'm just going to pass on a story I just heard that the governor's office picked Rob Cohen because the following people turned them down.

Joe Percocco
Alain Kalyeros
Todd Howe
Vito Lopez
Barry Ginsberg
Herb Teitelbaum
Elliot Spitzer and David Patterson

Well if nothing else Rob Cohen will make Seth Agata and Martin Levine look like Benjamin Cardozo

Hey Rob I'm just trying to be helpful you might want to edit your law firms website to tone down your role at JJOKE it looks a lot like you might be violating the Public Officers Law by using your state gig to get business.

Rob Cohen - the gift that will keep the blog in material for months.

I wonder what Weismann and Jacobs think about Rob Cohen being a commissioner?

Too funny   let me thank whomever suggested Rob Cohen for the job you are a true friend for bringing me this much joy!!!!!

Monday, January 23, 2017

Piling on

I almost feel bad writing this blog entry.

Poor Martin Levine got bitch slapped by a federal Judge.  That has to smart.

What am I talking about?  The Federal courts decision to abstain from ruling on Andy Celli's lawsuit claiming the JCOPE opinion on grassroots lobbying (that Martin wrote) violated the First Amendment.  Now regular readers know how much I enjoy saying I told you so but this time it's especially pleasurable because both sides, JCOPE and Andy Celli had their heads up their asses and I told them so at the time. https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=8012724775250138264#editor/target=post;postID=6904127879962274436;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=10;src=postname

Here is the article Bill Mahoney wrote at the time http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2016/03/pr-firms-file-suit-over-hopelessly-vague-jcope-lobbying-definition-032090

Pay careful attention to the last paragraph    "Celli said. “The good news is that we have federal courts and judges who determine these things, and I’ll let the court determine the case. I’m not going to respond to David Grandeau.”

Hey Andy the federal courts have decided I'm not the only one that thinks you just wasted a good bit of your clients money chasing a lawsuit that just wasn't ripe.   LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

And Martin don't kid yourself that JCOPE won anything here read what the Judge said about your legal acumen and writing skills: http://www.campaignfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/JCOPE.-Memorandum-and-Opinion.pdf

This is my favorite part:


 
First, the Advisory Opinion is an unclear state regulation that is subject to multiple,

contradictory interpretations. The Advisory Opinion states that a grassroots communication by a

consultant constitutes lobbying where it (1) “[r]eferences, suggests or otherwise implicates an

activity covered by [the Act],” (2) “[t]akes a clear position on the issue in question” and (3) “[i]s

an attempt to influence a public official through a call to action, i.e., solicits or exhorts the public



. . . to contact (a) public official(s).” Adv. Op. at 2.

However, the Advisory Opinion does not define what it means to “reference, suggest or

otherwise implicate lobbying activity.” Depending on the definition of that phrase, the number

and types of activities covered by the Advisory Opinion could be dramatically different. While

the Act defines lobbying as an attempt to influence the “passage or defeat” of legislation, among

other similar acts, N.Y. Legis. Law § 1-c(c ), “referenc[ing], suggest[ing] or otherwise

implicat[ing] lobbying activity” could mean something much broader. If a consultant helped

organize a campaign to inform legislators of their constituent’s views on an issue that is not the

subject of pending legislation, but which later could be, the Advisory Opinion might cover that

activity as suggesting or implicating lobbying activity, while the Act’s definition of lobbying

would not cover it.

The Advisory Opinion is also internally inconsistent. Its conclusion section states that a

call to action is necessary for a grassroots communication to fall under the Act, and defines a call

to action as soliciting or exhorting the public to contact public officials. Adv. Op. at 4. In

contrast, both the Advisory Opinion’s discussion section and the Grassroots Lobbying FAQ

imply that a consultant could be subject to the Act even if the relevant communication does not
 
 
 

 

 
 
include a call to action. According to the Advisory Opinion, consultants who both deliver a

message and control its content are engaging in grassroots lobbying. The discussion section and

Grassroots Lobbying FAQ both provide examples of delivering a message that do not include a

call to action. The discussion section notes that a consultant who “speaks to a group to advance

[a] client’s lobbying message” is delivering a message. Id. at 8. The Grassroots Lobbying FAQ



states that, where a consultant appears on television to support a client’s position on a

government action, that consultant is also delivering a message. Grassroots Lobbying FAQ at 1-

2. Because the Advisory Opinion states that a consultant has engaged in lobbying when the

consultant delivers a message and controls its content, it is possible to read the Advisory Opinion

as both expressly requiring and not requiring a call to action as part of the test for determining

whether an activity constitutes reportable lobbying.

In addition, the Advisory Opinion is ambiguous in light of the August 2016 amendment to

the Act. That amendment exempts press communications from reportable lobbying where a

putative lobbyist is speaking to a professional journalist about news. N.Y. Legis. Law § 1-

c(c)(B)(ii). Prior to the amendment, the Advisory Opinion included as reportable lobbying

urging a newspaper to publish an editorial that included a call to action. Following the

amendment, it is unclear whether an editorial that includes both a discussion of news and a call

to action is within the definition of lobbying, or whether communications with the press must be

solely related to current events with no additional agenda to be exempt. These ambiguities create

issues of first impression that are best resolved by a state court.
 
Hey Martin how many different ways can the Judge tell you that you suck at your job? LOLOLOLOLOL

 
I told Agata a year ago not to waste the taxpayers money on this opinion and Andy's litigation.  Mercury, Heller and Berlin Rosen have not registered STOP TALKING ABOUT IT AND BRING A CASE TO ENFORCE YOUR SHITTY OPINION.  Then Andy Celli would at least have a real case to litigate and bill his clients a second time for the work he should have waited to do to begin with.
 
And remember Martin is the same JCOPE counsel writing the new lobby regulations that JCOPE lacks statutory authority to issue.  I've got that Article 78 drawn up already I'm just going to wait until it's timely to file.  Unlike Andy Celli I'm not a premature litigator.
 

Thursday, December 15, 2016

The Times Union Trump and hypocrisy

The Capital Regions paper of record has an editorial today suggesting that the electoral collage reject the results of the election and pick anyone other than Trump  you can read it here:    http://www.timesunion.com/opinion/article/Electors-reject-Mr-Trump-10796574.php

Now compare that editorial gem with the one they wrote in October when they were horrified that Trump refused to state that he would accept the election results   you can read that here http://blog.timesunion.com/opinion/mr-trumps-sick-game/36584/

Funny how winning or losing changes ones perspective on accepting election results.

But now let me pivot and congratulate the deep thinkers on the TU editorial board.  I have been advocating for a long time that one man one vote doesn't work.  I prefer proportional voting based on the amount of income tax you pay, of course I'm a rich white male so that may cloud my judgement. This last election and primary season proved my point.  The average voter is unfortunately lacking in judgement, insight and knowledge, unfit to decide who should be president and better suited to watching reality tv and wrestling matches.  Would you give the responsibility to make decisions for your loved ones safety, health and welfare to the type of folks you see at Trump rallies or Clinton rallies or Bernie get togethers?  Now the TU provides an alternative to one man one vote, let the members of the electoral collage decide free of restriction.  And who are these electors?  Go google their identities it sure isn't one man one vote types.  It's the ruling political elite.  Not quite my proportional voting idea but a lot closer to it than one man one vote.

And before anyone comments on my perceived support of Trump.  Remember while I did work for him bringing a complaint against Schneiderman for fundraising from the subject of an investigation, I also fined Trump $250000 for being an unregistered lobbyist.  This isn't about Trump it's about hypocrisy.

So while the TU is laughingly hypocritical they are at least proposing ideas to get away from the real cause of our political dysfunction.  One man one vote just doesn't work.

And you wonder why the media can't seem to have an effect on Albany corruption

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Back by popular demand


 

IN THE CHRISTMAS SPIRIT

 

 

Twas the night before Christmas, in JJOKE’s Broadway hideout
no chairman was appointed since Horwitz had been tossed out


The commissioners were nestled teleconferencing on the tube
proving their incompetence and acting just like a boob


The hearings had been held the press releases sent,
Rozin was acting, the chair he did rent.


Weismann and Jacobs were nervous they were losing their hair
Their appointing authorities were convicted they might get the chair


Dan Horwitz had run off like a thief in the night,
he knew like every chairman before, what he did just wasn't right.


When out in the media there was a growing emotion
that JJOKE was corrupt it was more than a notion.


Percocco was indicted by Preet who would not be thwarted
his real target was a Governor whose affairs were documented and quite sordid


JJOKE never looked at Percocco’s outside employment
 Agata had told him don’t worry grab the cash so you can pay your rent


But now the media was asking why JJOKE gave Percocco a pass
Agata’s lies and excuses smelled like so much ass gas


What would they do the minions of Cuomo,
He called them by name all except Pee Pee Chang Decastro


On McClueless, On Martin and the lawyers all should
Come here Lori, Maria and the rest of the dead wood.


Come to my office we have to plan our attack
We need to get Grandeau off of our back.


With their heads filled with nothing cause they're dopes one and all
Jeannine and Deb said not us we are taking a long lunch at the mall


With his blog and public questions he has shown all our flaws
every mistep every coverup from Herb to the new regulations for the lobby laws


Our recent investigations into lobbyists and imputed gifts are pure bullshit
brought on orders from on high which we follow because we’re nitwits


At the end of the day not a single case will we make
all we will do is send letters telling targets they have been warned the whole process is so fake
 

Except DiBlasio and the Campaign for One New York
Once we identify all it’s donors Bill D we shall pork

 

It’s amazing to watch how much effort we spend
On the DiBlasio case every rule we will bend

 

But when it comes to Percocco,  Kalyeros and the rest
Agata decides he's not up to the test

 

The feds have a wire in a bar on Dove Street
Yet Agata ignores all 2nd floor corruption that falls at his feet

 

Agata will chase dead senators families job offers
But totally ignores who fills Cuomo’s daughters summer coffers

 

How can hiring the grown child of a senator be wrong
When Evan Stavisky uses his mom in every pitch song

 

The JJOKE elves have been shown to want to defund the not for profits
Why is Martin still working after all his fascist bullshit

 

Am I the only one that thought he looked like a mini-me
On Agata’s shoulder he perched at the hearing for all to see

 

As Agata did his best Al Franken impersonation
Seymor Knox left no doubt he is an ethics abomination

 

For 4 years he has been on JCOPE
And the first time he speaks he sounds like a complete dope

 

Renee Roth waits 3 years to declare
She had no idea what lobbyists file, what a waste of a commission chair

 

Dawn Smalls did her part to protect her law firm
What will she do when they have to register before the end of her term

 

McLaughlin is new he sat on the dais mute as a choate
Back home he is known as a reliable dull vote


The fact that his wife works for the senate is another conflict turn the page
Between him, Agata and Renzi there is plenty of spousal leverage

 

Those lobby regulations that they are touting
Will never be passed lobbyists are shouting

 

An Article 78 will be brought to shit can the whole mess
The Lobby statute only authorizes opinions not regs how did Martin ever pass his bar test

 

Grandeau continues to harass every JJOKER except LT
What did she do to keep him from cutting her off at the knee

 

There is a rumor about that all that it took
Was her batting her eyes and giving him a quick look

 

Not at her package that would be far too crass
She just kept him in the loop so he didn’t take a bite out of her ass

 

Now Agata is a completely different type
His actions don’t square with all his good guy hype

 

He’s shown he is a bullshitter
Put there only to protect the gov’s flanks and hind quarter


The sooner Agata quits
We can stop seeing Grandeau throw his blog fits


No matter what actions the Joke takes
Grandeau keeps thriving on NY’s ethics mistakes


As he drives past our building in a new car or sleigh
that’s been paid for from business that we’ve sent his way


We’ve made it easy for him to represent new clients
as we sit up here like a bunch of spoiled tyrants


I heard him exclaim as he beeped and drove off on his way to go dine
Merry Christmas to my JCOPE informants to the rest of you its time to resign




Thursday, November 24, 2016

Twinkie leaks 20 Have you read Bruno's new book?

I always take a few minutes on Thanksgiving to reflect on the past and try to avoid thinking about the future.  I started doing this in 2006 when it seemed to me every swinging dick Albany politician with juice wanted to fire me at the Lobby Commission and insure I never worked again (and really who could blame them - and yes I may have been paranoid and a narcissist but this is Albany and who could blame me).  As I sit down and reflect this year on the past, several thoughts come to mind.  To the three men who abolished the Lobby Commission - Fuck you bitches!!! Spitzer is sitting in his ivory castle secure in the knowledge that he is a whore fucker with no future in government and a reputation that has been sullied forever, a running punch line to a bad joke.  Shelly (whom I liked, I always thought abolishing the lobby commission was just business for him and not personal) is home counting the days until he either reports to prison or has to endure another trial and the cost thereof either way his future is bleak.  And my former patron, the man that did the most to form the political cynic, gadfly and muckracker that writes this blog, Joe Bruno, has had to write a book to try to redeem his reputation after two trials, one conviction and by his own account many many sleepless nights.  Revenge is a dish best supped when cold - Joe Bruno taught me that.  That and many other lessons about politics and people.  Thanks Joe I wouldn't be the person I am today without you.  As for the rest of the ruling class in Albany just ask yourself is Albany a cleaner more ethical capital since 2006?  They have all provided me reams and reams of notes to use in my blogs, enough that I could write a novel . . . wait I already did that.   And I want to thank all the inept, corrupt politicians and bureaucrats  that have made the blog so popular.  November 2016 has seen the highest number of views in the history of the blog, 8703 and counting.  I guess you like the hacked email series.  So here is another that you can read when you get back to work on Monday (although I admit I'm amazed how many of you read the blog nights and weekends).


From: Governors office department (GOD) 
  To: all department heads

 
Subject: Bruno's book
Date: November 24, 2016 8:59 AM

As of this moment Joe's book is number 43849 on Amazon.  I don't want any of you or your employees to buy a copy.  But you are directed to continue buying my book.  Give them as Christmas presents.  If his book sales exceed mine he will think he can be governor or president or pope.   There is only room for one italian egomaniac politician author in Albany and I'll be damned if it's going to be Joe Bruno.   I want all of you to scour the book for lies, half truths and unprosecuted crimes.  Remember three strikes and Joe is out.  Pay attention to chapter 26 I always thought something fishy was going on with the US Attorneys office and Pat Barrett.  The rumor was a deal had been made to look the other way and that was why Joe was so pissed when he got indicted.   Pay attention to the passage where Kay Stafford gets a heads up from Andy Baxter (the acting AUSA) that Joe will be indicted.  Why was the US Attorneys office providing Kay Stafford that info?  I've been around long enough to know a lay down gone wrong when I see it.  Also figure out why Joe would go talk to the feds about rumors that he was being investigated.  He obviously wasn't worried, did someone at the USA's office pass a message to Joe's friends that he had nothing to worry about?  Someone should FOIL the case file and see if there are any FD-302 reports talking about the actions of the US Attorney's office.

G.O.D.

From: AGATA JJOKE  
  To:Governors office department (GOD), all department heads

 
Subject: Bruno's book
Date: November 24, 2016 8:59 AM
Governor

I just checked, your book is at 982473 on the Amazon list so you have nothing to worry about.  You are farther ahead of Joe than Trump is over Clinton.  I don't think Bruno could ever catch up.  Do you think I should write a book?  Maybe include stories of my role in the Percocco scandal along with a how to section on the application of the lobby act?  I can have JJOKE pay for it if I call it a handbook for lobbyists.  Will you write the foreword?   And if we can't buy Bruno's book how are we suppose to scour it for crimes?

Seth

From: Governors office department (GOD) 
  To: all department heads

 
Subject: Bruno's book
Date: November 24, 2016 8:59 AM
Someone remind me why Agata still has a job.  And anyone that needs to read Bruno's book I heard there is one copy making the rounds in Albany  Read that one or go to the book store and read it there JUST DO NOT BUY IT.  If you can wait you can go to the JJOKE meeting Tuesday and steal the one Martin Levine is using as a booster seat.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Twinkieleaks 19 Martin Levine is pissing the governor off

Small problem for Martin the latest hacked email shows he is trying to reach beyond his position


From: Governors office department (GOD) 
  To:  FireAgata,Seth (JCOPE)" 
 
Subject: Martine Levine
Date: November 21, 2016 8:59 AM
Agata if you don't straighten that little piss ant Levine out I'm going to fire you and your wife and you will both be working at Tax for Barry Ginsberg.  I'm told by my lobbyist friends and donors that Marty Smurf is saying in writing that the requirement to list third parties on lobby forms is a "fact" and they now have to amend their forms to list me, if their lobbying had a political benefit for my public positions.  It's only one small step until that diminutive d-bag decides to treat my lobbyist friends like you are treating DiBlasio's lobbyist friends and claim that their lobbying is really an imputed gift to me.  Doesn't tiny dancer have better things to do than harass lobbyists over imagined and made up bull shit requirements?  I understand that Levine's vertical challenges has made him into an ethical bully but the limit of his intellect is glaring when compared to LT's soaring knowledge especially when Agata's little helper states that "It is well settled that the construction given statues and regulations by the agency responsible for their administration, if not irrational or unreasonable, should be upheld"  Doesn't that pea brain understand you need the Agency to actually have a construction of a statue or regulation?  I've looked, I've had Alphonso look, I've had Steve Cohen look hell even Monica Stamm looked THERE IS NO MENTION OF A REQUIREMENT TO LIST THIRD PARTIES ANYWHERE in the statute, in your rules, your regulations, your opinions and/or your guidelines.  Where did the little hand find this requirement?  Is he just making it up?  If he is just making it up is he smart enough to realize putting it on your forms is purely voluntary?  And that small as it is he will end up stepping on his own dick if he tries to enforce it.  I think Martin Miniscule's position is both irrational and unreasonable if the commission has never authorized it, don't you?  It reminds me of your stated position about Percocco's failure to file his financial disclosure report.  Relying on the past to support your mistake is a short sighted solution to a much bigger problem.
From:   FireAgata,Seth (JCOPE)" 
  To: Governors office department (GOD)
 
Subject: Martine Levine
Date: November 21, 2016 8:59 AM
I've looked at our lobby material for the first time and I can't find anything about third parties but Levine has assured me it originally was Grandeau's idea so it's not our fault.  Do you want the commissioners to send a letter to the regulated community retroactively making it a rule or an opinion or some other minor requirement?
Seth
 

From: Governors office department (GOD) 
  To:  FireAgata,Seth (JCOPE)" 
 
Subject: Martine Levine
Date: November 21, 2016 8:59 AM

My GOD you are dense.  Don't make this a big deal, don't blow it out of proportion.  Just put Martin in his booster seat and give him some infant toys to play with and hope the lobbyist's that are friends of mine don't revolt.