The blog prides itself on
being accurate and if not accurate at least being careful enough to avoid
looking foolish.
Unfortunately in our latest
entry regarding the Lee Kindlon story we may have relied too heavily on the
Times Union’s reporting and ended up being both.
Here’s what we wrote:
“The problem – based on what
I’ve read in the TU – is that Kindlon was working full time in a private law
firm while he was supposedly working full time on county-assigned cases.”
Members of the Kindlon camp
have contacted us (and I give them credit for having the stones to make the
call and discuss this issue like professionals) to set the record
straight. Here’s part of what they have
to say:
“The Times Union
articles, now two of them, are fiendishly inaccurate. Here are some true facts:
Lee Kindlon was a part time conflict defender. He has never been a full
time conflict defender.”
If indeed this is true
then the blog entry is based on a false premise and our apologies to all
concerned.
Now it’s up to the Times
Union to get an answer to the only question that matters to the blog was Lee Kindlon
a full time or part time county employee?
No comments:
Post a Comment